“Cloud Whitening” And The Hubris Of Science

I know that people disagree about the science and causes of “global warming,” but can we all agree that having scientists engage in large-scale environmental science experiments is not a great idea?

Consider the proposal to engage in “cloud whitening.”  Humans would spray fine droplets of sea water into the air.  The theory is that water vapor would condense around the salt crystals, producing new clouds or making existing clouds thicker and therefore “whiter.”  Whiter clouds reflect more solar energy back into space than does cloudless sky, so creating more, larger, and whiter clouds should reflect even more solar energy back into space, cooling the Earth.  The theory hasn’t been tested.  Nevertheless, many scientists apparently have seized on “cloud whitening” as a quick way to make a dent in global warming trends.

Now a scientist has announced results of a study that raises some significant cautionary issues about the concept of “cloud whitening.” Her study concludes that lots more salt would need to be sprayed than first thought, and that if we don’t get the size of the particles precisely right we could reduce cloud cover rather than increase it — and thereby increase the warming effect of solar energy.

I don’t know who will ultimately decide whether humanity should engage in some of the large-scale environmental engineering projects that periodically are proposed by scientists — but I hope it is someone with a healthy skepticism about the certainty of science and some humility about the ability of humans to confidently predict the results of their efforts on something as complex as the Earth’s weather systems.  We get all kinds of assurances from scientists and engineers, and sometimes they are wrong.  It’s one thing when they screw up a machine or a theory about how gravity works.  It’s quite another if their tinkering wrecks weather patterns and unintentionally turns Iowa into the Midwestern version of the Sahara Desert.

3 thoughts on ““Cloud Whitening” And The Hubris Of Science

  1. Nice post! Humans, and I guess I am saying scientists, are often arrogant and overconfident about their ability to control the outcomes of their actions.


  2. Do I have this correct? You are accusing science of hubris because they propose “cloud whitening”, then experiments are done (by a scientist) which show that the “theory” probably does not hold water. This is an example of how science is done. An hypothesis is proposed (that can be tested experimentally), experiments are done and the outcome either supports or denies the hypothesis.

    Am I missing something? Are large scale cloud whitening experiments about to be performed? Or have they just been proposed as a possible way of mitigating global warming? In science proposing an hypothesis is a far cry from actually doing it.


    • I don’t know of any immediately impending “cloud whitening” projects. The article suggests that “cloud whitening” has been proposed as a solution to global warming and has received support, although — as the experiments described in the linked article indicate — the science of “cloud whitening” is not far advanced.

      Of course, I agree with your description of how science is to work. The concern I have is that sometimes the slow but sure steps in scientific advancement get skipped, or the science gets politicized. That is why I think this little story about “cloud whitening” raises a bigger issue about the need to maintain a healthy skepticism and not immediately accept every scientific proposal that comes down the pike — especially with respect to proposals that deal with something as vast, complex, and multi-faceted as global weather and the environment — and to make sure that the science is rock-solid before any significant project gets underway.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s