Don’t look now, but states are jockeying to move up the dates of their primaries, caucuses, and other electoral contrivances. Florida has indicated that it is going to move its primary to January 31. If it does so, expect South Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada, and Iowa to follow suit, so they can maintain their current positions in the presidential pecking order. Such a result could mean the Iowa caucuses happen on January 9, 2012. Happy New Year! It’s time to vote!
It’s silly to be voting in January, 10 months before the actual election. No rational person would want to front-load the process because it increases the risk that a flukey candidate might get on a roll and knock everyone out of the race, only to be exposed months later as a hapless lightweight who isn’t ready for prime time. Rick Perry’s recent bumbling, fumbling, stumbling performance at a Florida debate aptly demonstrates why it makes sense to draw out the process, to give the candidates the chance to mature and to give the public a reasonable amount of time to get to know who they’re voting for.
So why is there this irresistible impetus to keep moving things up? States might claim it’s to maintain a tradition or because they want to have a say in selecting the candidates, but I think the real reason is money. Huge sums are spent on political campaigns these days, and the media flocks to the early primary states. Early primaries have more candidates and more campaigns spending cash, and states want to get their share. So why not schedule an early primary and then sit back and watch the hordes of candidates, staffers, consultants, pundits, and reporters descend, fill your hotels, restaurants and bars, buy the TV and radio spots and employ the printing presses, and pump up those hospitality and sales tax receipts?
Early primaries are good business.
How DO you figure out what’s supposed to be ugly & what’s not? What a conundrum…. Congrats on being FPd!