The BBC reports on a lawsuit by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals against Sea World. The case argues that killer whales have rights just as humans do and that keeping such whales in captivity violates the constitutional prohibition against slavery.
The lawsuit is pending in federal court in San Diego and purportedly was brought by five killer whales as the plaintiffs. The court held a hearing yesterday to determine whether the lawsuit could proceed. The BBC article above quotes the lawyer for the killer whales as saying: “For the first time in our nation’s history, a federal court heard arguments as to whether living, breathing, feeling beings have rights and can be enslaved simply because they happen to not have been born human. By any definition these orcas have been enslaved here.”
I was sorry to read these news articles, because the principal point of such lawsuits seems to be to attract media attention. No rational person, or lawyer, could really contend that our constitutional protections were written to protect, or should be read to extend to, killer whales or any other animal. But such provocative lawsuits allow advocacy organizations, for the price of a filing fee, to gain a platform from which to espouse their views and then hope that any resulting news coverage will encourage like-minded people who read such articles to contribute to the cause.
The news media would do us all a favor by ignoring this kind of legal grandstanding. I suppose I should, too.