A Response To Those Angry, Ignorant, Anonymous Comments

Our college friend and fellow Lantern alum Jim McKeever writes for an interesting and lively blog called Irish Investigations.  Yesterday he wrote a post about anonymous internet comments that is worth considering.

The context of Jim’s piece is straightforward.  Among his other positive qualities, Jim is a runner and an active participant in charitable causes.  In his community there is an Independence Day 10-mile run.  Two 12-year-old twin boys with muscular dystrophy wanted to participate in the race by being pushed in adapted “running strollers” by willing runners.  Amazingly, the race organizers initially denied the boys permission to participate, but news coverage and a social media firestorm caused them to reconsider.  The event occurred, the boys participated, and they were cheered along the race route.

But the on-line news stories about the incident elicited some of the angry, ignorant comments that any regular reader of on-line content has seen all too often, all made by people using pseudonyms.  It’s hard to imagine that anyone wouldn’t feel good about letting disabled boys participate in a community event, but the anonymous comments showed that, pathetically, some sad, mean-spirited people did.  Jim’s piece reacts to their comments, but also raises the larger issue of whether websites should permit anonymous postings in the first place.  He thinks that people who post anonymous comments are cowards and websites shouldn’t allow them to spew their venom, secure behind the protective veil of their fake on-line names.

I get Jim’s point, but I have a different take on the issue.  I think there is value in allowing pseudonymous comments precisely because it allows people to expose their innermost thoughts.  Usually those thoughts aren’t offensive, and the posters just want to avoid any concern that they might get blowback or provoke a nut to begin stalking them — after all, the internet can be a scary place.  But even if the thoughts are angry or stupid, like the comments Jim describes, I think it’s worth seeing them precisely because it allows them to be exposed as ignorant and idiotic.  Although Jim didn’t mention this in his piece, I hope that good people like Jim responded to every one of those ignorant posts and, maybe, helped to convince the anonymous posters that their views are terribly out of line.

Technology allows so many people to live their lives in a cocoon, without much meaningful interaction with the world.  The haters at their computer keyboards may believe that their hateful views are widely shared.  When they surface from their dens to make ignorant anonymous posts, we all have the opportunity to disabuse them of that notion.

3 thoughts on “A Response To Those Angry, Ignorant, Anonymous Comments

  1. Bob, thank you and your piece was the first thing I saw this morning. Well done, as usual, very thoughtful and insightful. I do agree with you to some extent, but these trolls have hit too close to home a few times after tragic deaths of young people, and the hurt from their comments lingered for years. And is still there, in some cases. When you and I worked for newspapers, my former employer (the one in question here) had a full-time editor who read every letter to the editor and called the sender to assure its legitimacy and authorship before it was published. Now? Forget it. Register with an e-mail address, type up some hate speech and let ‘er rip. Sure, they’ll delete it eventually for violating “community standards,” but it’s a farce. It’s all about the hits, and encouraging reporters to be “SEO sweethearts.” (I am not making that up). If I had the time, or the inclination, I’d try to figure out the identities of some of these clowns and ‘out’ them. Apparently some trolls have done that to each other. Must be nice to have so much free time! Thanks again, Bob, and my best to Kish & your sons.


    • And to you and your family, Jim!

      We agree that whoever said “sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me” didn’t know what they were talking about. Words do matter, and mean words do hurt. The question is what to do about them. Your point about trying to “out” the people who cross the line in their comments is, I think, in line with my thoughts about responding by pointing out the ignorance and not letting the mean, anonymous comments go uncontested. Either way, the point is to always challenge the bigots and the trolls.

      Your point about media outlets that actively seek to gin up comments from the lunatic fringe is an extremely important one. A key part of fourth estate freedoms is using that freedom responsibly. That applies as much to anonymous website comments as it does to other, attributed content.


Leave a Reply to Jim McKeever Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s