I’m back in Cleveland for another stay at the fabulous Hyatt Arcade. Its lavish interior decorations, glittering flourishes, and gold paint seem well-suited to Cleveland’s new attitude. With LeBron James coming home and the Republican National Convention on the calendar for 2016, the residents of The Best Location in the Nation all seem to be walking with smiles on their faces and a spring in their steps.
Yesterday Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California was asked about whether President Obama should alter his current schedule, which includes attending a number of fundraising events, so that he can focus more on some of the crises in the world, such as the downing of the passenger jet over the Ukraine by pro-Russian forces, the surge by ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and the escalated Israeli-Palestinian fighting in Gaza. Senator Feinstein’s response was delicately phrased. She said that the world would very much respect his “increased attention” to these matters, because the Leader of the Free World needs to lead in such times.
President Obama has attended a lot of fundraisers during his tenure in office. The Washington Post recently calculated that he has held 393 fundraisers while in office, which is more than George W. Bush’s total during his full two terms but not quite as many as Bill Clinton’s record. It’s not hard to understand why Presidents like fundraisers. By definition, it’s a friendly gathering — after all, everyone else in attendance is ponying up thousands of dollars to be there, and obviously they’re not paying that much for the food — and at the end of the event the President can see tangible results and tote up the money he’s raised to support candidates who will support his agenda.
The Obama Administration no doubt would contend that the President is fully in touch with his national security team and capable of dealing with these crises whether he’s in the Oval Office or wearing a tux at some glittering event. Maybe . . . although the combination of world events and the mess at our border raise legitimate questions about whether the President is fully in control of events. In any case, I think Senator Feinstein has put her finger on something significant.
Appearances and messaging are important in today’s world. It’s hard to successfully characterize something as a crisis if you can’t be bothered to change your schedule and skip non-essential events in order to work the phones with international leaders and build working coalitions to deal with the problem. When the President goes to fundraisers in the midst of these events, he’s implicitly communicating that he is more concerned about Republicans than he is about the Middle East, or the Ukrainian separatist activities, or the influx of unaccompanied minor illegal immigrants.
Senator Feinstein recognizes that — and, I suspect, so do the perpetrators of the events that have given rise to these crises in the first place. I think it’s time for the President to skip a few fundraisers.