Richard had another really good article published in the Florida Times-Union this week. This one is about the history of Army Corps of Engineers’ chronic underestimates of costs — and the resulting substantial cost overruns — in prior efforts to deepen the Jacksonville harbor. It’s a significant issue for the people of Jacksonville, because a new river-dredging project is being touted, and local government would be picking up part of the tab.
This kind of story is important, whether you live in Jacksonville or not, because it deals with a very common scenario. Business leaders and politicians pitch a big project, promising that it will create jobs and is needed to keep the community competitive. Politicians like big projects because they create a sense of progress and, not incidentally, the pols get to award contracts for the construction work. Project boosters produce feasibility studies and cost estimates that make the project seem like a bargain and it gets approved — but then when the bills roll in, the costs are far above the estimates and, often, the promised economic benefits either don’t materialize at all or are far below what was forecast.
In this instance, Richard used public records requests to obtain documents that show what prior Jacksonville harbor-deepening projects actually cost, which is typically many multiples of the rosy cost estimates provided before the projects got underway. It’s another good example of Richard’s smart use of access laws to report facts that help to educate the reader and provide some meaningful context to the political promises.
It’s interesting that one of the people Richard interviewed for the story, a professor who studies ports, noted that every large infrastructure project involves cost overruns and delays. We would all do well to keep that reality in mind the next time our local leaders want taxpayers to endorse a new jobs-and-progress project.