End Of An Era

After more than 75 years, the Diamond Grille in Akron is changing hands.  Since 1941, the restaurant with the great name and the classic, cool neon sign has been owned by the Thomas family and has held down the same spot at 77 West Market Street.

12024588-largeThis week the Thomas family announced that it has sold the restaurant to a long-time waitress who promises to keep things pretty much the same they always have been — with the exception of renovating the bathrooms and adding some fresh vegetables to the menu.  I guess that long-time fans of the restaurant, and I am one of many, will be willing to accept those slight modifications so long as you can still go to the Diamond to get the same great steaks and seafood, drink the same great drinks, and enjoy an atmosphere that makes you feel like it’s 1958 and Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, and Sammy Davis, Jr. might just be found in the booth next to yours.  It’s one of those joints that is unforgettable and timeless.

The Diamond Grille has been an important part of Webner family lore and was a place that my mother and father used to socialize with their friends.  Uncle Mack worked there when he was a callow youth, and Kish and I had had a memorable dinner there with Mom, Aunt Bebe, and Uncle Mack and Aunt Corinne a few years ago.  The last time I chowed down at the Diamond I took a colleague there for lunch.  She’d never been there before, and as we were eating she looking around with a sense of wonder and said:  “This place is great!”

Of course, she was right.  The Webner family wishes the Thomas family the very best as they move on to other things, and wants to thank them for a lifetime of wonderful memories.  If you’re interested, you can read about some of our experiences at the Diamond here, here, here, and here.

Advertisements

Puerto Rico’s Impending “Bankruptcy”

Puerto Rico has been struggling financially for years.  Yesterday the U.S. territory  decided to invoke a new federal statute that will allow the island to go through a process something like bankruptcy, in hopes that it will be able to shed its crushing debt load and get a “fresh start.”  Puerto Rico owes $74 billion to bondholders and has another $49 billion in unfunded pension obligations and has been unsuccessful in convincing Congress to bail it out or cajoling creditors into making concessions.  Making timely principal and interest payments on its debt requires $3.5 billion in payments a year, but Puerto Rico has only $800 million to spare.  The inexorable results of that math made the quasi-bankruptcy inevitable, triggering what will be the largest government “bankruptcy” process in U.S. history.

no-bailout-puerto-ricoThe process will be something like a bankruptcy because Puerto Rico — like every U.S. state and territory — technically cannot go through the traditional federal bankruptcy process.  Instead, Puerto Rico has invoked the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), enacted during the Obama Administration, which contains some elements of the bankruptcy laws but also includes special provisions providing that, in some ways, Puerto Rico must be treated as a sovereign.  Under the PROMESA law, the process of dealing with Puerto Rico’s debt will be supervised by a federal bankruptcy judge.  Chief Justice John Roberts will appoint the judge, who will then start deciding what to do with Puerto Rico’s appalling financial problems.

Puerto Rico invoked PROMESA because a stay that had prevented creditors from suing ended and a series of creditors immediately filed suit, hoping to be first in line to be paid.  The PROMESA law stops those lawsuits and, Puerto Rico hopes, will give it substantial leverage to negotiate with creditors and try to convince them to take pennies on the dollar for the debt — with the threat that, if creditors don’t agree, the federal judge could impose an even more draconian result.  Creditors are furious.  Republicans in Congress aren’t willing to go with a bailout option, arguing that Puerto Rico has already received big federal subsidies and should explain why it got into this predicament.

It’s an entirely reasonable request that, frankly, could also be made to many U.S. cities and states that face similar debt issues.  Puerto Rico’s economy has struggled for years, and Puerto Rico officials decided, year after year, to borrow to pay their operating expenses rather than doing the responsible thing:  cutting costs, pruning government employee pensions, trimming payrolls, and forsaking pet projects in favor of fiscal prudence.  Now creditors and employees who have pension obligations will have to take pennies on the dollar, and according to a federal board Puerto Rico is “unable to provide its citizens effective services” — all because Puerto Rico’s politicians were unable to make the tough decisions and kept borrowing to put off doing so until some point in the future.  Now that time has come.

Investors who may have bought Puerto Rico bonds at a discount, after the difficulties became obvious, might not be sympathetic characters, but many of its bonds likely are held by individuals who viewed bonds issued by a U.S. territory to be a pretty safe investment that would help fund their retirement years.  And employees who have earned pensions will receive less than they were promised, meaning they’ll have to tighten their belts even though Puerto Rico’s successive governments didn’t do so.  And a default of sorts on Puerto Rico’s governmental debt isn’t going to be helpful for other governmental entities that want to borrow through issuance of bonds, either.

Interesting, isn’t it, that the federal statute that allows Puerto Rico to go through the quasi-bankruptcy process — PROMESA — sounds a lot like “promise”?  Thanks to its governmental mismanagement, for Puerto Rico the PROMESA process it will be more like promises broken.  I only hope that the successive administrations who put their heads in the sand and borrowed, borrowed, and borrowed are in some way held accountable for their gross irresponsibility.