The New York Times has an interesting opinion piece on the annual effort of the National Association of Home Builders to present its vision of the “New American Home.” Since 1984, the NAHB has built a New American Home somewhere in the United States. The underlying concept is that, in the process, the NAHB will try out the latest building and energy technologies, consider the functionality of different floor plans, and innovate with new materials.
But what’s happened is that the New American Home has gotten a lot bigger and a lot more elaborate. The first New American Home was 1500 square feet, but since then the standard has changed considerably. The 2018 version, pictured at right, is close to 11,000 square feet, with eight — 8! — bathrooms and both an elevator and a car elevator in the garage. The 2019 version will be 8,000 square feet with an “inner sanctum lounge.” Prior versions of the New American Home have included amenities like a waterfall off the master bedroom suite.
The article wonders whether the concept of the New American Home hasn’t gone off in the wrong direction. Rather than going for increasingly elaborate McMansions out in the suburbs, why not focus on condos, or smaller houses in urban settings? Why build “homes” that exceed 10,000 square feet and have 8 bathrooms when American families have grown smaller, not larger? These are all good questions in my view.
For years, home ownership has been a core part of the American dream — but that doesn’t mean the home has to be some sprawling monstrosity on an acre and a half of property in a gated community. When immigrants came to the U.S. in the 1800s they built neighborhoods like German Village, where I now live — a neighborhood right next to downtown Columbus, where the houses are small (ours is less than 2000 square feet) and are placed cheek by jowl with commercial buildings and apartments. It’s a great community, and just about everything we need is within walking distance. We love the convenience and the neighborhood feel.
I like living in a smaller space. We don’t need 10,000 square feet to rattle around in, and I wouldn’t want to pay what it costs to get that amount of personal space, either. I think it would be interesting if the NAHB revisited the New American Home concept and tried to develop homes that are smaller, less expensive, and closer to the downtown cores, and don’t contribute to still more suburban sprawl. Wouldn’t home designers welcome a challenge to build homes that don’t require endless space, where creativity is needed to make use of every square foot?