They’ve found an object out there that behaves unlike anything else. Where Earth, Mars, and the other planets in our solar system travel on a flat plane in relation to the Sun, this object, and the cluster of other objects around it, doesn’t. The Trans-Neptunian Object, nicknamed “Niku” after the Chinese word for rebellious, orbits in a plane that is tilted 110 degrees in relation to the plane of the planets. Even more weirdly, it orbits the sun in the opposite direction of almost everything else in the solar system. The TNO is tiny — about 124 miles in diameter — and is 160,000 time fainter than Neptune.
So what is the TNO, exactly, and why is it behaving so weirdly? Scientists think it must have been knocked off course, either by the gravitational effects of some unknown, massive object, but they’ve found no evidence of that so far. And, of course, there will be people who wonder whether the TNO isn’t following the rules of the rest of the solar system because it actually isn’t part of the solar system at all — it’s some huge ship, or beacon, or some other indicator of extraterrestrial intelligence.
I’ve often wondered what would have happened if America hadn’t put the brakes on its space program after the Apollo flights ended, and had spent the last 45 years perfecting interplanetary travel, building bases, and taking humanity out into the rest of the solar system. In that alternative world, we might have been in a position to send a ship out to check out Niku, and see just how rebellious — or unusual — it really is.
If you’ve read anything about the early days of Earth, you’ve read about how our home planet had a thick, heavy atmosphere, filled with greenhouse gases that trapped heat and allowed early plants and other organisms to take root and ultimately thrive. That was the prevailing scientific consensus.
It’s long been clear that the environment of planet Earth is ever-changing, but the studies of the gas bubbles indicates that the changes over time are even more significant than was suspected. That’s an interesting discovery, but it might also have practical consequences in our search for life forms on other moons and planets. Scientists searching for extraterrestrial life tend to look for planets that are “Earth-like” in the sense of modern-day Earth — but it turns out our own planet wasn’t very “Earth-like” at all in its early days. The range of places that could support life therefore is likely much wider than previously suspected.
So scientists are wrong about the early atmosphere on Earth, just as they have been wrong about countless other things during the long and rich history of science. That’s the great thing about science — inaccuracy and failed hypotheses are just an inevitable part of the process. In this case, the scientific error also happens to tell us something useful and gratifying about just how tenacious life forms can be.
Scientists are now finding evidence that there are a lot of apparently habitable planets out there, in a temperate zone in relation to their suns, where water is likely to form.
So why in the world (pun intended) aren’t we hearing or seeing signs of alien life when we point our radio telescopes at other star systems? Our ability to search for evidence of life elsewhere has developed to the point where the lack of any contact has to be considered in any scientific theory about how life develops — and scientists are, in fact, doing just that.
The new theories posit that the world — our world — in fact played a key role. They envision a “Gaian Bottleneck”: a kind of choke point that most alien life doesn’t survive. While early, microbial life forms may have developed on those wet, rocky planets scientists are identifying just about everywhere, more complex life forms require planets with weather systems and atmospheric that are relatively stable. The Gaian Bottleneck posits that such stability is lacking on many planets, and that changes in temperature or atmosphere killed off the alien life when it was in its fragile, early stages and unable to defend itself through evolution. Thus, both Venus and Mars may have had early life forms, but the developmental arc of those planets — toward a high-pressure hot house on Venus, and a frigid, barren desert on Mars — killed them off.
Earth, though, somehow threaded the needle. So, we’re special.
Of course, Earth’s example means some planets make it past any Gaian Bottleneck, so there may be advanced life out there — just not as much as you might think.
Curiosity drove over a Martian rock and broke it open, exposing a dazzling white exterior. The striking ivory color indicates the presence of hydrated minerals in the rock. As any person who walks around with a water bottle knows, “hydration” requires water, and hydrated minerals are those that are formed when water is found. Curiosity also has detected clay-type minerals in a different rock — another clue suggesting the presence of water at some point. These discoveries are part of a growing body of evidence that running water once existed on this part of the surface of Mars.
I’m of the Star Trek generation. I believe that looking for — and especially finding — life beyond the confines of our home planet is a good way to get squabbling humans to recognize that their differences are minor and not worthy of much attention in the grand scheme of things. We need to move beyond a mindset that focuses exclusively on our own fleeting creature comforts and recognize that we live in but one tiny, wayward corner of an unimaginably vast universe. It’s been 40 years since humans walked on the Moon. When will we take the next step, to Mars and beyond, to see whether life in fact may be found elsewhere?
The search for extraterrestrial intelligence has made huge strides in recent years.
Using new techniques, scientists have identified many apparently habitable planets, thereby suggesting that the first ingredient of extraterrestrial intelligence — a planet where a sophisticated alien race might develop — is much more common than people once thought. Studies have shown that life has developed and thrived in the most inhospitable climates on Earth, from superhot underseas vents to the coldest ice caves at our poles. And now, astronomers are targeting specific stars with radio frequency searches designed to hear any radio wave activity.
The astronomers examined Gliese 581, a red dwarf 20 light years away that is orbited by six planets, including two jumbo-sized Earth-like planets. If Gliese 581 were aiming a similar array at Earth, it would hear countless radio broadcasts from 20 years ago — lots of the music of Nirvana, and reports on the upcoming Bush-Clinton presidential election, no doubt. But from Gliese 581, the astronomers heard . . . nothing. If there is life on the planets in the Gliese 581 system, it either hasn’t progressed to the point of using radio technology or uses some other form of communication we haven’t discovered.
The fact that we haven’t heard an answer yet doesn’t mean life isn’t out there somewhere. The technique used on Gliese 581 was targeted at a small dot in a universe that has countless such dots. The astronomers could experience years of radio silence from their targets, but the world would change immediately if the radio astronomers heard alien communications from just one target — as was the case in Maria Doria Russell’s excellent novel The Sparrow.
We don’t know if we’re unique, and whether Earth is the only planet in the vast universe where intelligent creatures capable of extraterrestrial communications have developed. Being something of a skeptic, I’m not willing to accept that proposition. Time, and some more efforts to listen in on alien radio, will tell.
The discovery was made by the Cassini spacecraft, which has been flying around the huge gas giant and its famous rings. Cassini reached a point within 46 miles of the south pole of ice-covered Enceladus, one of Saturn’s many moons, and on its close pass Cassini actually flew through the jets of water vapor and ice that make up the geysers emanating from the moon. In so doing, the probe “tasted” the vapor and determined that it consists of water, organic compounds, and salt, at the same salinity levels as Earth’s oceans.
The evidence suggests that there are liquid oceans underneath Enceladus’ icy crust, and that the water may be in contact with the moon’s rocky core — which could be supplying the chemical compounds that are the building blocks of life. This discovery makes Enceladus a prime candidate for another mission designed to determine whether life in some form actually exists on the moon. We’ll just have to hope that we can find the money necessary to fund the mission that will follow up on this very intriguing discovery.
It’s hard to believe, but a lot of our world remains unexplored. The oceans which cover most of the Earth’s surface, for example, remain fertile ground for scientific examination.
At various locations in the Earth’s oceans are superdeep trenches that plunge downward for miles. For years scientists believed that the super-dark, super-cold trenches must be devoid of life, because no known life form could stand the immense pressures exerted by the miles of water overhead. Now scientists are learning that they were wrong. The trenches have lots of life — and it is pretty weird.
These supergiant amphipods join other creatures that are known to live in the trenches. They all show that life is hardy, tough, and will usually find a way to survive in even the most inhospitable habitats.
Discoveries like this should make us all curious about the possibilities of finding life on other planets and moons. If amphipods can thrive in absolutely dark, intensely cold environments at pressures that would immediately crush a normal creature like an eggshell, why couldn’t creatures somehow find a way to survive in, say, the hot, heavy atmosphere of Venus or on one of Jupiter’s moons?
The study looked at the dispersion of debris from asteroid impacts on the Earth’s surface. It found that such debris is far more likely to reach Mars, or even Jupiter and Saturn and their moons, than was previously thought. If such debris contained small life forms, they therefore could have reached other places that are capable of sustaining life. Of course, any microbes and other organisms on the debris would have to be hardy enough to survive years of travel through space, exposure to radiation, the fall to the surface of another planet, and the different atmospheres and living conditions on those planets — but we know that there are organisms that can survive such conditions, and we also know that life is tenacious and is found in even the most hostile and extreme climates on Earth.
We won’t know, of course, whether this scenario could actually have produced life elsewhere until we find such life and test it. If we do find such life, however, it will give new meaning to the phrase “Mother Earth.”
Scientists are debating a provocative new study that suggests that life is found elsewhere in the universe, and may have arrived on Earth by way or meteors and comets.
In an article published in the Journal of Cosmology, NASA astrobiologist Richard B. Hoover reports on his studies of a rare type of meteor. He concludes that the meteors include fossils of bacterial life. Some of the micro-organisms are recognizable and closely associated with life found here on Earth, like the gian bacterium pictured above. Other apparent fossils are of unknown life forms. Hoover is convinced of his findings. Other scientists, however, are skeptical — skepticism, after all, is one of the fundamental tenets of good science — and want more proof.
If Hoover’s conclusions are correct, then the implications are Earth-shaking. The study suggests that life is more common than thought and can survive in the harshest imaginable conditions. It also suggests that life may have originated elsewhere and landed on Earth via comet and meteor — in effect, that Earth was seeded with life forms from another place. The apparent fossils that look familiar thrived after they arrived in Earth’s moist, oxygen-rich atmosphere; those that look unfamiliar, however, died out. And, because scientists are uncovering evidence of increasing numbers of Earth-like planets in the galaxy, the study suggests that life could have been seeded, by the same means, on other planets. If that is so, then the chances of intelligent extraterrestrial life forms may be greater than previously thought.
Continuing developments in telescope technology are causing astronomers to increase their estimates of the number of Earth-like worlds in the universe.
The latest disclosure deals with the existence of “red dwarf” stars, which are dimmer and smaller than the Sun. Until recently, telescopes have not been sufficiently powerful to detect such stars in other galaxies. Enhancements to telescopes, however, have allowed astronomers to determine that red dwarf stars are far more common than was previously suspected. Indeed, astronomers believe that such stars are 20 times more prevalent in older galaxies than in our galaxy. As a result, astronomers also are concluding that there likely are many more Earth-like planets orbiting those stars — possibly trillions of Earth-like worlds.
Trillions of Earth-like planets? The concept is provocative, because increases in the number of planets logically also increases the likelihood of life, and therefore intelligent life, on at least some of those faraway planets. And the follow-up question is even more provocative: would the existence of intelligent extraterrestrial life be good or bad? Would we rather be the only intelligent life forms in the universe, or would we prefer to learn that we are not alone — indeed, that intelligent life is as common as the fish in the sea? How comfortable would humans be with the knowledge that they live in a crowded neighborhood, where neighbors might drop in for a visit at any moment?
If you follow science news, you regularly see reports on scientists who are looking for proof of the existence of extraterrestial life. The latest story is a report on the examination of geological formations on Mars. Scientists are finding minerals and geological formations at one particular Martian site that are very similar to minerals and geological formations found at a site on Earth that contains evidence of life forms that existed 3.5 billion years ago. The similarity of the sites causes scientists to believe that the same kinds of life forms may have existed on Mars billions of years ago.
With the development of increasingly refined extraterrestrial telescopes, other forms of radiation detection and imaging technology, highly sophisticated exploration satellites, and robotic equipment that can land on other planets and conduct experiments, we are moving slowly but steadily closer to finding conclusive proof of past or present extraterrestial life. It may be in the form of fossils found on some now-desolate planet, or the identification actual living creatures that live in the liquid seas found on the moons of Saturn and Jupiter, or in some other form — but the day of that ultimate discovery seems to be drawing nearer.
The question to ponder is, how will mankind react to such a discovery? Will it affect religious doctrine and philosphical discourse? Will it cause people to realize that the differences between peoples of different countries are not so great after all? Or will people who are otherwise absorbed in their daily lives even care?
The Daily Mail has an interesting piece today on tantalizing indications that there might be a form of life on Titan, a moon that orbits Saturn. Titan is one of the largest moons in the solar system and has a dense atmosphere.
The Daily Mail piece reports on two articles recently published in scientific journals that attempt to find evidence of life by focusing on the presence and absence of certain elements and chemicals. One article notes that hydrogen that is found in Titan’s atmosphere seems to disappear when it reaches the surface and posits that a potential explanation is that the hydrogen is breathed, or otherwise consumed, by life forms on the surface. The second article suggests that a similar conclusion could be inferred from the absence of still another chemical on the surface.
It is always risky to make broad extrapolations based on the absence of something, but the scholarly articles and the indicators they highlight are intriguing. They confirm, once again, that exploring the moons of Saturn and Jupiter could be tremendously rewarding from a scientific standpoint. If there is life on Titan, however, it would be quite different from life on Earth. Although there is liquid on Titan, the liquid is methane, and scientists think life would be methane-based.
Scientist Stephen Hawking is convinced that there is alien life elsewhere in the universe — mathematically, it just seems likely — but strongly recommends that we not look for them. He envisions a situation where a nomadic race of aliens might raid the Earth for our natural resources or a “Columbus discovers the New World” scenario where the friendly welcoming natives get wiped out by disease or violence. Hawking therefore adopts the “pessimistic” view of extraterrestial contact where marauding aliens who find us would be perfectly happy to wipe us out. (The “optimistic” view, epitomized by Star Trek, posits that any aliens intelligent enough to cross interstellar space are intelligent enough not to be bloodthirsty mass murderers.)
In law school we called the Hawking approach “foxholing.” If you hadn’t read the case and weren’t prepared you tried to stay out of the professor’s line of sight and hoped he wouldn’t call on you. If the technique worked, you made it to the next class without undue embarrassment — but I always thought the better approach was to be prepared in the first place.
The BBC website has an interesting article and clips from a TV show about the possibility of life on Europa, an ice-bound moon of Jupiter that is about the same size of Earth’s Moon. The theory is that all life on Earth has one common element — liquid water — and that studies of Europa indicate that beneath its sheath of ice is a significant amount of liquid water where life could be found. The scientists compare Europa to inhospitable parts of Earth, like the caves underneath an Icelandic glacier where micro-organic life is found, and ask why life could not therefore be found on Europa.
Check our the videos attached to the article, which are really interesting and well done.